HYS vs. HYHG
HYS (PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYS tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y) while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYS returned 5.35%/yr vs 6.17%/yr for HYHG. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYS charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
HYS vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, HYS has underperformed HYHG with an annualized return of 5.35%, while HYHG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.17% annualized return.
HYS
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
HYHG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
HYS vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.33% | 8.80% | 8.42% | 11.38% | -5.42% | 4.77% | 3.27% | 10.22% | -1.05% | 5.75% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 2.90% | 5.31% | 11.41% | 14.69% | -1.71% | 5.75% | 0.16% | 12.02% | -1.95% | 3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYS and HYHG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2013 | 0.53 |
The correlation between HYS and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYS vs. HYHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYS
HYHG
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
HYS
HYHG
Basic Materials
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Consumer Defensive
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Energy
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Financial Services
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Healthcare
HYS
-
HYHG
Industrials
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Real Estate
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Technology
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Utilities
HYS
-
HYHG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYS vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
HYS
HYHG
HYS vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYS | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.24 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.64 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | 11.96 | +3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYS | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.32 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.86 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.68 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.46 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
HYS vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYS | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.91% | -25.71% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.88% | -2.02% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.98% | -7.47% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.61% | -9.21% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.91% | -25.71% | +4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.45% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -3.04% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | 0.61% | -0.15% |
Volatility
HYS vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) is 1.23%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that HYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYS | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.45% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 4.33% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 5.56% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.26% | 8.16% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 9.15% | -2.31% |
HYS vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYS vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than HYHG's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.79% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF | 7.36% | 7.20% | 7.43% | 6.44% | 5.01% | 3.74% | 4.52% | 4.98% | 4.64% | 5.01% | 5.13% | 5.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYS and HYHG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYHG has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to HYS (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYS dropped -20.91% vs HYHG's -25.71%.
On 10-year performance, HYHG leads with 6.17% vs 5.35% for HYS. On fees, HYHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HYS has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 6.17% return vs 5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.
HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 6.79% for HYHG.
HYS tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y), while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 0.50% for HYHG.
HYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYS and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer