HYS vs. DADS
HYS (PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYS is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYS charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
HYS vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 15.40% return.
HYS
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
DADS
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYS vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.33% | 3.35% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 15.40% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYS and DADS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYS vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
HYS
DADS
HYS vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYS | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.04 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYS | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.81 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
HYS vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYS | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.91% | -17.07% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.90% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -7.66% | +6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility
HYS vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYS | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 17.59% | -14.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.26% | 17.59% | -11.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 17.59% | -10.75% |
HYS vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYS vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than DADS's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.74% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF | 7.36% | 7.20% | 7.43% | 6.44% | 5.01% | 3.74% | 4.52% | 4.98% | 4.64% | 5.01% | 5.13% | 5.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYS and DADS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 2.74% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for HYS and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer