PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYS vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYS vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.58% return.


HYS

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.83%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
5.35%

BBHY

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.96%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYS vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.33%8.80%8.42%11.38%-5.42%4.77%3.27%10.22%-1.05%5.75%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.58%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%5.36%14.35%-2.50%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HYS and BBHY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.81

The correlation between HYS and BBHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYS vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYS
BBHY

Communication Services

100.0%
7.9%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Energy

-

5.2%

Financial Services

-

4.1%

Healthcare

-

5.4%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Technology

-

4.0%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Communication Services

HYS
100.0%
BBHY
7.9%

Basic Materials

HYS

-

BBHY
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HYS

-

BBHY
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

HYS

-

BBHY
2.5%

Energy

HYS

-

BBHY
5.2%

Financial Services

HYS

-

BBHY
4.1%

Healthcare

HYS

-

BBHY
5.4%

Industrials

HYS

-

BBHY
8.4%

Real Estate

HYS

-

BBHY
3.9%

Technology

HYS

-

BBHY
4.0%

Utilities

HYS

-

BBHY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYS vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYS vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYSBBHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

3.02

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

13.58

+1.77

HYS vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYS and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYSBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.98

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.57

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.64

+0.17

Drawdowns

HYS vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-24.98%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-2.37%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

-5.00%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.61%

-15.32%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.30%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-2.37%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.53%

-0.07%

Volatility

HYS vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.12%. This indicates that HYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.12%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

2.86%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

3.62%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.26%

7.26%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.84%

7.53%

-0.69%

HYS vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYS vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than BBHY's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.95%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%0.00%
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
7.36%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, HYS and BBHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HYS has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to BBHY (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYS dropped -20.91% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 5-year performance, HYS leads with 5.08% vs 4.09% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYS has performed better with a 5.08% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.

HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 6.95% for BBHY.

HYS tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y), while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 0.15% for BBHY.

HYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYS and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer