HYS vs. BAMY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HYS (PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF) and BAMY (Brookstone Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y), while BAMY is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Brookstone. HYS is passively managed, while BAMY is actively managed. Over the past year, HYS returned 6.52% vs 10.01% for BAMY. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYS charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for BAMY.

Performance

HYS vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than BAMY's 1.41% return.

HYS

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 6.52%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

BAMY

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 10.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYS vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF	1.56%	8.80%	8.42%	5.86%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	1.41%	12.93%	10.60%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HYS and BAMY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.65

The correlation between HYS and BAMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HYS vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYS

HYS Risk / Return Rank: 68
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 81
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYS vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HYS	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.22	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	3.21	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.47	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	4.05	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.11	18.10	-3.98

HYS vs. BAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BAMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYS and BAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HYS vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and BAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYS	BAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.91%	-6.03%	-14.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.88%	-2.48%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.15%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-0.52%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	0.55%	-0.09%

Volatility

HYS vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) is 0.79%, while Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) has a volatility of 0.93%. This indicates that HYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYS	BAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	0.93%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	2.84%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	4.57%	-1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.27%	5.99%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.83%	5.99%	+0.84%

HYS vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYS vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison

HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, less than BAMY's 7.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	7.57%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF	7.34%	7.20%	7.43%	6.44%	5.01%	3.74%	4.52%	4.98%	4.64%	5.01%	5.13%	5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYS and BAMY in my portfolio?

HYS and BAMY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYS or BAMY?

BAMY has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to HYS (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYS dropped -20.91% vs BAMY's -6.03%.

Which ETF is better, HYS or BAMY?

On 1-year performance, BAMY leads with 10.01% vs 6.52% for HYS. On fees, HYS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, HYS has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYS or BAMY?

Over the 1-year period, BAMY has performed better with a 10.01% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYS or BAMY?

HYS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYS or BAMY?

BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 7.34% for HYS.

What is the main difference between HYS and BAMY?

HYS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BAMY is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 1.48% for BAMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.