HYPG vs. XRPZ

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

HYPG (Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds. HYPG is actively managed, while XRPZ is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

HYPG vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF (HYPG) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HYPG

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: -16.45%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRPZ

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -7.34%
• 6M: -47.55%
• YTD: -40.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYPG vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HYPG Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF	-17.94%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	-10.56%

Correlation

The correlation between HYPG and XRPZ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

HYPG vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF (HYPG) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

HYPG vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYPG drawdown since its inception was -26.56%, smaller than the maximum XRPZ drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYPG and XRPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYPG	XRPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.56%	-55.39%	+28.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.00%	-52.84%	+34.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.45%	-34.03%	+22.58%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HYPG	XRPZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	93.58%	70.97%	+22.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.58%	70.97%	+22.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.58%	70.97%	+22.61%

Dividends

HYPG vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYPG nor XRPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYPG and XRPZ in my portfolio?

HYPG and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYPG or XRPZ?

HYPG and XRPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between HYPG and XRPZ?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin.