PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMB vs. FUMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYMB vs. FUMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMB achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than FUMB's 1.07% return.


HYMB

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.19%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.18%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
2.46%

FUMB

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.15%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.30%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMB vs. FUMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%1.91%
FUMB
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
1.07%2.78%3.05%2.84%-0.03%0.38%1.25%1.76%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and FUMB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMB vs. FUMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FUMB
FUMB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FUMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMB vs. FUMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYMBFUMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.76

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

11.70

-9.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

44.37

-35.86

HYMB vs. FUMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the FUMB Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and FUMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYMBFUMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

3.38

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

1.70

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.00

-0.55

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. FUMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than FUMB's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and FUMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMBFUMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-2.68%

-26.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-0.22%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

-0.60%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-1.25%

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.03%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-0.19%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.06%

+0.82%

Volatility

HYMB vs. FUMB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB) at 0.20%. This indicates that HYMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMBFUMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.20%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

0.53%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

0.76%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

1.16%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.36%

1.77%

+9.59%

HYMB vs. FUMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FUMB's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYMB vs. FUMB - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than FUMB's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUMB
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
2.80%2.90%2.86%2.24%1.02%0.43%0.94%1.74%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.54%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMB and FUMB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FUMB (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs FUMB's -2.68%.

On 5-year performance, FUMB leads with 1.96% vs 0.42% for HYMB. On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FUMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FUMB has performed better with a 1.96% return vs 0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FUMB.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.80% for FUMB.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMB and 0.45% for FUMB.

FUMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMB and FUMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer