PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMB vs. FNJHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYMB vs. FNJHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (FNJHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMB achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than FNJHX's 1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, HYMB has underperformed FNJHX with an annualized return of 2.46%, while FNJHX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.67% annualized return.


HYMB

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.19%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.18%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
2.46%

FNJHX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.84%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMB vs. FNJHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%4.91%3.22%
FNJHX
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund
1.41%5.61%1.23%8.08%-9.75%2.04%5.13%8.67%1.46%6.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and FNJHX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2011

0.48

The correlation between HYMB and FNJHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.64 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMB vs. FNJHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FNJHX
FNJHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FNJHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNJHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNJHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FNJHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNJHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMB vs. FNJHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (FNJHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYMBFNJHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.73

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.41

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

8.42

+0.09

HYMB vs. FNJHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the FNJHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and FNJHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYMBFNJHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.88

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.33

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.65

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.30

-0.85

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. FNJHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than FNJHX's maximum drawdown of -14.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and FNJHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMBFNJHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-14.74%

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-3.10%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

-5.42%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-14.74%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

-14.74%

-14.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.75%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-1.77%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.89%

-0.01%

Volatility

HYMB vs. FNJHX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (FNJHX) at 1.09%. This indicates that HYMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNJHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMBFNJHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.09%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

2.08%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

2.60%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

3.94%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.36%

4.09%

+7.27%

HYMB vs. FNJHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FNJHX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYMB vs. FNJHX - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than FNJHX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNJHX
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund
2.98%3.66%2.69%2.67%1.78%2.11%2.60%3.45%2.96%3.47%4.18%3.19%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.54%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMB and FNJHX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FNJHX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs FNJHX's -14.74%.

FNJHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMB and FNJHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer