HYLD vs. IBHG
HYLD (High Yield ETF) and IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYLD is actively managed, while IBHG is passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYLD charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHG.
Performance
HYLD vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYLD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLD vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLD High Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.80% | -11.48% | -0.17% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.10% | 6.90% | 7.42% | 11.27% | -8.88% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLD and IBHG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.37 |
The correlation between HYLD and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLD vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank
HYLD
IBHG
HYLD vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Yield ETF (HYLD) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYLD | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.57 | — |
Drawdowns
HYLD vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLD | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -13.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.09% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.67% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility
HYLD vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLD | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 6.36% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 6.36% | — |
HYLD vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLD has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLD vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison
HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLD High Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.67% | 7.86% | 6.45% | 7.52% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 7.18% | 6.59% | 10.87% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.07% | 6.33% | 7.02% | 6.66% | 5.62% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLD and IBHG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.
IBHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.07%, compared with 0.00% for HYLD.
They also come from different issuers: Eve Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for HYLD and 0.35% for IBHG.
Find the right allocation for HYLD and IBHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer