HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO
HYLD.TO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF) and SMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - HYLD.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while SMVP.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index. HYLD.TO is actively managed, while SMVP.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, HYLD.TO returned 39.58% vs 9.47% for SMVP.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYLD.TO charges 2.37%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SMVP.TO.
Performance
HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLD.TO achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than SMVP.TO's 5.14% return.
HYLD.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 39.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMVP.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYLD.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF | 15.59% | 18.34% |
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) | 5.14% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLD.TO and SMVP.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HYLD.TO
SMVP.TO
HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYLD.TO | SMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.16 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 1.43 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.59 | 3.40 | +11.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYLD.TO | SMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 0.92 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.39 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.38%, which is greater than SMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLD.TO and SMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLD.TO | SMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.38% | -12.11% | -19.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.04% | -6.44% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -5.31% | +5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -2.60% | -6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.71% | +0.01% |
Volatility
HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) at 3.18%. This indicates that HYLD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMVP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLD.TO | SMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.18% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 7.34% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 10.07% | +5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 13.14% | +6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 13.14% | +6.07% |
HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLD.TO has a 2.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SMVP.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLD.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
HYLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, more than SMVP.TO's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLD.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF | 11.25% | 11.98% | 12.13% | 12.11% | 13.02% |
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) | 2.26% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLD.TO and SMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.37% for HYLD.TO.
HYLD.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMVP.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 2.37% for HYLD.TO and 0.00% for SMVP.TO.
Find the right allocation for HYLD.TO and SMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer