PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLD.TO achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than SMAX.TO's 18.79% return.


HYLD.TO

1D
0.09%
1M
9.70%
YTD
15.73%
6M
15.82%
1Y
39.70%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
10Y*

SMAX.TO

1D
0.31%
1M
10.49%
YTD
18.79%
6M
17.56%
1Y
44.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYLD.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF
15.73%22.14%25.39%13.53%
SMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
18.79%18.64%40.16%7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.84

The correlation between HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO

Technology

33.9%
33.6%

Financial Services

12.4%
11.5%

Communication Services

11.3%
11.9%

Healthcare

9.8%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
8.3%

Industrials

5.0%
8.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.8%

Energy

4.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

3.8%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.0%

Utilities

2.4%
3.9%

Technology

HYLD.TO
33.9%
SMAX.TO
33.6%

Financial Services

HYLD.TO
12.4%
SMAX.TO
11.5%

Communication Services

HYLD.TO
11.3%
SMAX.TO
11.9%

Healthcare

HYLD.TO
9.8%
SMAX.TO
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HYLD.TO
8.1%
SMAX.TO
8.3%

Industrials

HYLD.TO
5.0%
SMAX.TO
8.1%

Basic Materials

HYLD.TO
5.0%
SMAX.TO
3.8%

Energy

HYLD.TO
4.9%
SMAX.TO
3.6%

Real Estate

HYLD.TO
3.8%
SMAX.TO
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

HYLD.TO
3.4%
SMAX.TO
4.0%

Utilities

HYLD.TO
2.4%
SMAX.TO
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLD.TO
HYLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HYLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX.TO
SMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYLD.TOSMAX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.71

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

6.95

-3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.63

25.77

-11.14

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the SMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYLD.TOSMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

3.61

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

2.32

-1.63

Drawdowns

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.38%, which is greater than SMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLD.TOSMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.38%

-18.22%

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.04%

-6.42%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-2.09%

-6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

1.73%

+0.99%

Volatility

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) is 4.58%, while Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that HYLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLD.TOSMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

5.51%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

9.72%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

12.36%

+2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

14.62%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

14.62%

+4.60%

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLD.TO has a 2.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

HYLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.23%, less than SMAX.TO's 13.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYLD.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF
11.23%11.98%12.13%12.11%13.02%
SMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
13.36%14.67%13.88%2.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMAX.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMAX.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 2.37% for HYLD.TO.

Their fees differ too: 2.37% for HYLD.TO and 0.65% for SMAX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer