HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO
HYLD.TO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF) and SMAX.TO (Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYLD.TO returned 39.70% vs 44.38% for SMAX.TO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYLD.TO charges 2.37%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SMAX.TO.
Performance
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLD.TO achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than SMAX.TO's 18.79% return.
HYLD.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 39.70%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 17.56%
- 1Y
- 44.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLD.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF | 15.73% | 22.14% | 25.39% | 13.53% |
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 18.79% | 18.64% | 40.16% | 7.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Financial Services
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Communication Services
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Healthcare
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Industrials
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Basic Materials
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Energy
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Real Estate
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Consumer Defensive
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Utilities
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HYLD.TO
SMAX.TO
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYLD.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.71 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 6.95 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.63 | 25.77 | -11.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYLD.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 3.61 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 2.32 | -1.63 |
Drawdowns
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.38%, which is greater than SMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLD.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.38% | -18.22% | -13.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.04% | -6.42% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -2.09% | -6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 1.73% | +0.99% |
Volatility
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) is 4.58%, while Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that HYLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLD.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 5.51% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 9.72% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 12.36% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 14.62% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 14.62% | +4.60% |
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLD.TO has a 2.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLD.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
HYLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.23%, less than SMAX.TO's 13.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLD.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF | 11.23% | 11.98% | 12.13% | 12.11% | 13.02% |
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 13.36% | 14.67% | 13.88% | 2.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMAX.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMAX.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 2.37% for HYLD.TO.
Their fees differ too: 2.37% for HYLD.TO and 0.65% for SMAX.TO.
Find the right allocation for HYLD.TO and SMAX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer