PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYLD.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LQDH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLD.L achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH.L's 2.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HYLD.L having a 4.32% annualized return and LQDH.L not far ahead at 4.41%.


HYLD.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.54%
6M
0.72%
YTD
0.39%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*
4.32%

LQDH.L

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.21%
6M
2.01%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
4.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYLD.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.39%14.42%2.61%13.55%-11.99%-0.90%8.32%11.99%-4.23%9.84%
LQDH.L
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.46%4.93%8.27%11.54%0.28%0.92%0.77%10.76%-2.64%4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLD.L and LQDH.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2013

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between HYLD.L and LQDH.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLD.L
HYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDH.L
LQDH.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LQDH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYLD.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LQDH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYLD.LLQDH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

3.30

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

11.26

-7.99

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the LQDH.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLD.L and LQDH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLD.L drawdown since its inception was -23.53%, roughly equal to the maximum LQDH.L drawdown of -23.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLD.L and LQDH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLD.LLQDH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.53%

-23.77%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.21%

-1.39%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

-2.81%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-6.42%

-16.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.53%

-23.77%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.34%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-1.46%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

0.41%

+0.87%

Volatility

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYLD.L) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LQDH.L) at 0.84%. This indicates that HYLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLD.LLQDH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.84%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.20%

2.19%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

3.18%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.30%

4.87%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

6.41%

+2.16%

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYLD.L vs. LQDH.L - Dividend Comparison

HYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than LQDH.L's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYLD.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
7.11%5.32%5.61%4.70%4.01%3.95%4.42%4.77%4.98%4.73%5.08%5.31%
LQDH.L
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.33%4.66%5.52%4.83%2.07%1.55%2.45%3.52%2.87%2.14%2.46%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLD.L and LQDH.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LQDH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LQDH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYLD.L.

HYLD.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped (USD) Index, while LQDH.L tracks IBOXX US Dollar Liquid Investment Grade IR Hedged Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYLD.L and 0.25% for LQDH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLD.L and LQDH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer