HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L
HYLA.L (iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XCOU.L (Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) are both Global Corporate Bonds funds - HYLA.L tracks the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped (USD) Index while XCOU.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYLA.L returned 7.55%/yr vs 5.36%/yr for XCOU.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYLA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XCOU.L.
Performance
HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLA.L achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than XCOU.L's 0.81% return.
HYLA.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- —
XCOU.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLA.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.29% | 14.45% | 2.59% | 13.39% | 0.69% |
XCOU.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 0.81% | 5.28% | 4.41% | 8.47% | -4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLA.L and XCOU.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022 | 0.40 |
The correlation between HYLA.L and XCOU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L — Risk / Return Rank
HYLA.L
XCOU.L
HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYLA.L) and Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYLA.L | XCOU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.21 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | 3.83 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, which is greater than XCOU.L's maximum drawdown of -7.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLA.L and XCOU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLA.L | XCOU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -7.95% | -16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.62% | -2.46% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.65% | -2.46% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -0.92% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -1.52% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 0.78% | +0.60% |
Volatility
HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYLA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) at 0.75%. This indicates that HYLA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCOU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLA.L | XCOU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 0.75% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 2.28% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.85% | 2.66% | +3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.19% | 4.06% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 4.06% | +5.19% |
HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XCOU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLA.L vs. XCOU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HYLA.L nor XCOU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLA.L and XCOU.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCOU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCOU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYLA.L.
HYLA.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped (USD) Index, while XCOU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYLA.L and 0.15% for XCOU.L.
Find the right allocation for HYLA.L and XCOU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer