PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYLA.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYLA.L is traded in USD, while V3GS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the V3GS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLA.L achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than V3GS.L's 1.11% return.


HYLA.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.29%
6M
0.59%
YTD
0.29%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
7.55%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*

V3GS.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.61%
6M
1.51%
YTD
1.11%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HYLA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.29%14.45%2.59%13.39%-11.81%-1.35%
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
1.11%18.80%6.00%18.18%-21.88%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLA.L and V3GS.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.64

The correlation between HYLA.L and V3GS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLA.L
HYLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HYLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

V3GS.L
V3GS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYLA.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYLA.LV3GS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

1.24

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

3.22

-0.36

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLA.L and V3GS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum V3GS.L drawdown of -36.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLA.L and V3GS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLA.LV3GS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-36.25%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.62%

-5.28%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.65%

-10.59%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.93%

-36.18%

+13.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-1.91%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-10.24%

+6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

2.04%

-0.66%

Volatility

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYLA.L) is 1.37%, while Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that HYLA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3GS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLA.LV3GS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

2.08%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

6.61%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.85%

8.70%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

11.70%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

11.57%

-2.32%

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than V3GS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYLA.L vs. V3GS.L - Dividend Comparison

HYLA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V3GS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HYLA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
2.53%3.59%4.25%4.00%2.43%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLA.L and V3GS.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYLA.L.

HYLA.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped (USD) Index, while V3GS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYLA.L and 0.15% for V3GS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLA.L and V3GS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer