HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L
HYLA.L (iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and LQDH.L (iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - HYLA.L tracks the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped (USD) Index while LQDH.L tracks the IBOXX US Dollar Liquid Investment Grade IR Hedged Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYLA.L returned 3.07%/yr vs 5.37%/yr for LQDH.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYLA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.L.
Performance
HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLA.L achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH.L's 2.46% return.
HYLA.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLA.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.29% | 14.45% | 2.59% | 13.39% | -11.81% | -0.14% | 7.57% | 11.83% | -3.50% | -0.18% |
LQDH.L iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.46% | 4.93% | 8.27% | 11.54% | 0.28% | 0.92% | 0.77% | 10.76% | -2.64% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLA.L and LQDH.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HYLA.L and LQDH.L has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L — Risk / Return Rank
HYLA.L
LQDH.L
HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYLA.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LQDH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYLA.L | LQDH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 3.30 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | 11.26 | -8.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, roughly equal to the maximum LQDH.L drawdown of -23.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLA.L and LQDH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLA.L | LQDH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -23.77% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.62% | -1.39% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.65% | -2.81% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.93% | -6.42% | -16.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -0.34% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -1.46% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 0.41% | +0.97% |
Volatility
HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYLA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LQDH.L) at 0.84%. This indicates that HYLA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLA.L | LQDH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 0.84% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 2.19% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.85% | 3.18% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.19% | 4.87% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 6.41% | +2.84% |
HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLA.L vs. LQDH.L - Dividend Comparison
HYLA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLA.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDH.L iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.33% | 4.66% | 5.52% | 4.83% | 2.07% | 1.55% | 2.45% | 3.52% | 2.87% | 2.14% | 2.46% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLA.L and LQDH.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQDH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQDH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYLA.L.
HYLA.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped (USD) Index, while LQDH.L tracks IBOXX US Dollar Liquid Investment Grade IR Hedged Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYLA.L and 0.25% for LQDH.L.
Find the right allocation for HYLA.L and LQDH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer