PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (HYKE) and iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYKE is traded in USD, while CRQ.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CRQ.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


HYKE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRQ.NEO

1D
1.02%
1M
2.53%
YTD
15.72%
6M
20.71%
1Y
42.03%
3Y*
25.34%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
12.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYKE

CRQ.NEO
CRQ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CRQ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRQ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRQ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CRQ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRQ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (HYKE) and iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYKECRQ.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

Drawdowns

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYKE drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CRQ.NEO drawdown of -47.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYKE and CRQ.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYKECRQ.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-47.39%

+47.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.86%

+9.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

Volatility

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYKECRQ.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

11.59%

-11.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

16.09%

-16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

19.79%

-19.79%

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYKE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CRQ.NEO's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HYKE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRQ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRQ.NEO
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF
1.87%2.18%2.72%2.97%2.90%2.17%2.98%2.71%2.46%1.91%1.89%3.09%
HYKE
Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CRQ.NEO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRQ.NEO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYKE.

HYKE is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while CRQ.NEO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cboe Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYKE and 0.72% for CRQ.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYKE and CRQ.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer