HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO
HYKE (Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and CRQ.NEO (iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYKE is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Cboe Vest, while CRQ.NEO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Canada Index. HYKE is actively managed, while CRQ.NEO is passively managed. HYKE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for CRQ.NEO.
Performance
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HYKE is traded in USD, while CRQ.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CRQ.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
HYKE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRQ.NEO
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 20.71%
- 1Y
- 42.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HYKE Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 0.00% |
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF | 11.85% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
HYKE
CRQ.NEO
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (HYKE) and iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYKE | CRQ.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.47 | — |
Drawdowns
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYKE drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CRQ.NEO drawdown of -47.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYKE and CRQ.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYKE | CRQ.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -47.39% | +47.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -9.86% | +9.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYKE | CRQ.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 11.59% | -11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 16.09% | -16.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 19.79% | -19.79% |
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYKE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CRQ.NEO's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYKE vs. CRQ.NEO - Dividend Comparison
HYKE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRQ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF | 1.87% | 2.18% | 2.72% | 2.97% | 2.90% | 2.17% | 2.98% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 1.91% | 1.89% | 3.09% |
HYKE Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CRQ.NEO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRQ.NEO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYKE.
HYKE is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while CRQ.NEO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cboe Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYKE and 0.72% for CRQ.NEO.
Find the right allocation for HYKE and CRQ.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer