HYHG vs. JCPI
HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) and JCPI (JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYHG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while JCPI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan. HYHG is passively managed, while JCPI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYHG returned 9.78%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for JCPI. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JCPI.
Performance
HYHG vs. JCPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYHG achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than JCPI's 1.65% return.
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
JCPI
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG vs. JCPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.03% | 5.31% | 11.41% | 14.69% | -0.19% |
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | 1.65% | 7.10% | 4.70% | 5.04% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYHG and JCPI is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022 | 0.04 |
The correlation between HYHG and JCPI shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYHG vs. JCPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYHG
JCPI
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HYHG
JCPI
Healthcare
HYHG
JCPI
Basic Materials
HYHG
-
JCPI
Consumer Cyclical
HYHG
-
JCPI
Consumer Defensive
HYHG
-
JCPI
Energy
HYHG
-
JCPI
Financial Services
HYHG
-
JCPI
Industrials
HYHG
-
JCPI
Real Estate
HYHG
-
JCPI
Technology
HYHG
-
JCPI
Utilities
HYHG
-
JCPI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYHG vs. JCPI — Risk / Return Rank
HYHG
JCPI
HYHG vs. JCPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYHG | JCPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 3.21 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.28 | 11.08 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYHG | JCPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.76 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.67 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
HYHG vs. JCPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYHG drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, which is greater than JCPI's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYHG and JCPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYHG | JCPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.71% | -7.85% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | -1.60% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.47% | -2.81% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.44% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -1.87% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.46% | +0.15% |
Volatility
HYHG vs. JCPI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) at 0.86%. This indicates that HYHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYHG | JCPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 0.86% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.30% | 2.04% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 2.94% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.16% | 4.50% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.15% | 4.50% | +4.65% |
HYHG vs. JCPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JCPI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYHG vs. JCPI - Dividend Comparison
HYHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than JCPI's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.78% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | 3.94% | 3.93% | 3.98% | 3.45% | 3.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYHG and JCPI have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYHG has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to JCPI (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYHG dropped -25.71% vs JCPI's -7.85%.
On 3-year performance, HYHG leads with 9.78% vs 5.33% for JCPI. On fees, JCPI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, JCPI has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 9.78% return vs 5.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JCPI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 3.94% for JCPI.
HYHG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while JCPI is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYHG and 0.25% for JCPI.
JCPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYHG and JCPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer