HYHG vs. DADS
HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYHG is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
HYHG vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYHG achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.37% return.
HYHG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
DADS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 2.90% | 2.59% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.37% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYHG and DADS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYHG vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
HYHG
DADS
HYHG vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYHG | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYHG | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.73 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
HYHG vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYHG drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYHG and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYHG | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.71% | -17.07% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -2.77% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -7.63% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility
HYHG vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYHG | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 17.58% | -12.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.16% | 17.58% | -9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.15% | 17.58% | -8.43% |
HYHG vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYHG vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
HYHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.79% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYHG and DADS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYHG and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for HYHG and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer