PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGU.L vs. WING.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGU.L vs. WING.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares € High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (HYGU.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGU.L achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than WING.L's 0.95% return.


HYGU.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.14%
6M
2.07%
YTD
2.07%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*

WING.L

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.32%
6M
0.95%
YTD
0.95%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
7.30%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
5.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGU.L vs. WING.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYGU.L
iShares € High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
2.07%7.24%7.29%13.55%-7.14%3.72%2.16%12.83%-0.86%0.71%
WING.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.95%12.63%2.89%12.92%-14.36%2.26%17.97%15.54%-5.11%2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGU.L and WING.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2017

0.64

The correlation between HYGU.L and WING.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGU.L vs. WING.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGU.L
HYGU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HYGU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

WING.L
WING.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WING.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WING.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
WING.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WING.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WING.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGU.L vs. WING.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (HYGU.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGU.LWING.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.33

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

5.23

+3.19

HYGU.L vs. WING.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the WING.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGU.L and WING.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGU.L vs. WING.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, roughly equal to the maximum WING.L drawdown of -25.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGU.L and WING.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGU.LWING.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-25.18%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-4.36%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.62%

-5.02%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.61%

-21.62%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.50%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-3.97%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

1.11%

-0.50%

Volatility

HYGU.L vs. WING.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (HYGU.L) is 0.62%, while iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that HYGU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WING.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGU.LWING.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

1.58%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

3.86%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

4.84%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.37%

7.47%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.10%

9.09%

-1.99%

HYGU.L vs. WING.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGU.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WING.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGU.L vs. WING.L - Dividend Comparison

HYGU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WING.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYGU.L
iShares € High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WING.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.71%5.67%5.86%5.20%4.43%3.92%4.25%4.56%4.98%4.44%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGU.L and WING.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WING.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WING.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HYGU.L.

HYGU.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while WING.L is High Yield Bonds. HYGU.L tracks Markit iBoxx Euro Liquid High Yield Index (EUR), while WING.L tracks Bloomberg Global Corporate ex EM Fallen Angels 3% Issuer Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for HYGU.L and 0.50% for WING.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGU.L and WING.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer