PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGH vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGH vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGH achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.58% return.


HYGH

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.83%
6M
3.59%
1Y
7.60%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
6.36%

BBHY

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.96%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGH vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
2.83%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%5.82%0.54%11.09%-0.85%6.38%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.58%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%5.36%14.35%-2.50%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGH and BBHY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.70

The correlation between HYGH and BBHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYGH vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYGH
BBHY

Utilities

99.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
3.9%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Energy

-

5.2%

Financial Services

-

4.1%

Healthcare

-

5.4%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Technology

-

4.0%

Utilities

HYGH
99.6%
BBHY
2.0%

Real Estate

HYGH
0.4%
BBHY
3.9%

Basic Materials

HYGH

-

BBHY
3.2%

Communication Services

HYGH

-

BBHY
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HYGH

-

BBHY
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

HYGH

-

BBHY
2.5%

Energy

HYGH

-

BBHY
5.2%

Financial Services

HYGH

-

BBHY
4.1%

Healthcare

HYGH

-

BBHY
5.4%

Industrials

HYGH

-

BBHY
8.4%

Technology

HYGH

-

BBHY
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGH vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGH vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYGHBBHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

1.98

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

3.01

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

3.02

+1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.40

13.58

+4.82

HYGH vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGH Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGH and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYGHBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.98

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.57

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.64

-0.09

Drawdowns

HYGH vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGH drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, roughly equal to the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGH and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGHBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-24.98%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-2.37%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

-5.00%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.24%

-15.32%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.30%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-2.37%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.53%

-0.12%

Volatility

HYGH vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) is 0.63%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that HYGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGHBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

1.12%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

2.86%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

3.62%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

7.26%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.35%

7.53%

+0.82%

HYGH vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGH has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGH vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

HYGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than BBHY's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.95%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%0.00%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.63%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGH and BBHY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBHY has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to HYGH (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGH dropped -23.88% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 5-year performance, HYGH leads with 6.94% vs 4.09% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYGH has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 6.94% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HYGH.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 6.63% for HYGH.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HYGH and 0.15% for BBHY.

HYGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGH and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer