PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYGB.L is traded in GBP, while XUHY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUHY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGB.L achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than XUHY.L's 1.76% return.


HYGB.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.50%
6M
2.88%
YTD
3.41%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*

XUHY.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
-1.03%
6M
1.33%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
3.41%1.56%13.72%1.66%-2.52%0.59%1.90%10.99%-23.28%
XUHY.L
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
1.76%1.39%8.93%7.89%-1.53%4.52%2.86%11.26%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGB.L and XUHY.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.47

The correlation between HYGB.L and XUHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (5 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGB.L
HYGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XUHY.L
XUHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XUHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XUHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGB.LXUHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

1.57

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

4.73

+1.17

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the XUHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGB.L and XUHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGB.L drawdown since its inception was -26.72%, which is greater than XUHY.L's maximum drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGB.L and XUHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGB.LXUHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.72%

-15.69%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-3.67%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.96%

-9.70%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.02%

-9.70%

-13.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-2.43%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-3.17%

-11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.22%

+0.07%

Volatility

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L) have volatilities of 1.95% and 1.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGB.LXUHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.91%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.98%

5.56%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

7.00%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

9.28%

+8.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

10.34%

+7.07%

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XUHY.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGB.L vs. XUHY.L - Dividend Comparison

HYGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUHY.L
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
6.60%6.29%7.63%5.89%6.12%9.56%5.49%4.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGB.L and XUHY.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUHY.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUHY.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYGB.L.

HYGB.L tracks VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF, while XUHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYGB.L and 0.20% for XUHY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGB.L and XUHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer