HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L
HYGB.L (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) and DFNG.L (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYGB.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF, while DFNG.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYGB.L returned 8.57%/yr vs 34.05%/yr for DFNG.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYGB.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DFNG.L.
Performance
HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGB.L achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than DFNG.L's -5.39% return.
HYGB.L
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
DFNG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- 6M
- -20.55%
- YTD
- -5.39%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- 34.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGB.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 3.41% | 1.56% | 13.72% | 2.79% |
DFNG.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | -5.39% | 56.54% | 46.20% | -1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGB.L and DFNG.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HYGB.L
DFNG.L
HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYGB.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.03 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 0.08 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 0.18 | +5.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGB.L drawdown since its inception was -26.72%, which is greater than DFNG.L's maximum drawdown of -24.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGB.L and DFNG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGB.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.72% | -24.31% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -24.31% | +21.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.96% | -24.31% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -22.71% | +20.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -5.39% | -8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 10.00% | -8.71% |
Volatility
HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) is 1.95%, while VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNG.L) has a volatility of 9.66%. This indicates that HYGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGB.L | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 9.66% | -7.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.98% | 19.49% | -14.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.52% | 25.74% | -19.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 23.67% | -5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 23.67% | -6.26% |
HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGB.L vs. DFNG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HYGB.L nor DFNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGB.L and DFNG.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.
HYGB.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while DFNG.L is Aerospace & Defense. HYGB.L tracks VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF, while DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYGB.L and 0.55% for DFNG.L.
Find the right allocation for HYGB.L and DFNG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer