PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. PEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYG vs. PEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than PEY's 11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed PEY with an annualized return of 4.94%, while PEY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.50% annualized return.


HYG

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.73%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
4.94%

PEY

1D
-1.52%
1M
2.48%
YTD
11.81%
6M
11.63%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. PEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.32%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
11.81%0.56%5.25%7.29%2.45%26.15%-3.85%24.76%-7.49%8.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and PEY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2007

0.53

The correlation between HYG and PEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYG vs. PEY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYG
PEY

Utilities

99.6%
12.0%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

6.4%

Communication Services

-

5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

16.9%

Energy

-

1.5%

Financial Services

-

21.7%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Industrials

-

15.0%

Technology

-

6.5%

Utilities

HYG
99.6%
PEY
12.0%

Real Estate

HYG
0.4%
PEY

-

Basic Materials

HYG

-

PEY
6.4%

Communication Services

HYG

-

PEY
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HYG

-

PEY
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

HYG

-

PEY
16.9%

Energy

HYG

-

PEY
1.5%

Financial Services

HYG

-

PEY
21.7%

Healthcare

HYG

-

PEY
6.8%

Industrials

HYG

-

PEY
15.0%

Technology

HYG

-

PEY
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. PEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PEY
PEY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEY Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. PEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYGPEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.75

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

4.90

+7.43

HYG vs. PEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the PEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and PEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYGPEYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.11

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.34

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.45

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.28

+0.18

Drawdowns

HYG vs. PEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum PEY drawdown of -72.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and PEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGPEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-72.81%

+38.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-8.88%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-17.90%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-17.90%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

-41.55%

+19.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.64%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-12.88%

+9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

3.17%

-2.64%

Volatility

HYG vs. PEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.21%, while Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGPEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

3.82%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

9.30%

-6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81%

14.09%

-10.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

16.40%

-8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

18.90%

-10.61%

HYG vs. PEY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PEY's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYG vs. PEY - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than PEY's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.92%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
4.52%4.85%4.44%4.58%4.22%3.83%4.30%3.78%4.33%3.21%3.12%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYG and PEY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEY has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to HYG (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs PEY's -72.81%.

On 10-year performance, PEY leads with 8.50% vs 4.94% for HYG. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PEY has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for PEY.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 4.52% for PEY.

HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PEY is Mid Cap Value Equities. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while PEY tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.54% for PEY.

HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and PEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer