HYG vs. HYHG
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYG tracks the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYG returned 4.91%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for HYHG. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
HYG vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed HYHG with an annualized return of 4.91%, while HYHG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.12% annualized return.
HYG
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
HYG vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.51% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.03% | 5.31% | 11.41% | 14.69% | -1.71% | 5.75% | 0.16% | 12.02% | -1.95% | 3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and HYHG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2013 | 0.55 |
The correlation between HYG and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYG vs. HYHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYG
HYHG
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
HYG
HYHG
-
Real Estate
HYG
HYHG
-
Basic Materials
HYG
-
HYHG
-
Communication Services
HYG
-
HYHG
Consumer Cyclical
HYG
-
HYHG
-
Consumer Defensive
HYG
-
HYHG
-
Energy
HYG
-
HYHG
-
Financial Services
HYG
-
HYHG
-
Healthcare
HYG
-
HYHG
Industrials
HYG
-
HYHG
-
Technology
HYG
-
HYHG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
HYHG
HYG vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYG | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.74 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 12.28 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYG | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.36 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.86 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.67 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
HYG vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than HYHG's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -25.71% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -2.02% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -7.47% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -9.21% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | -25.71% | +3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.32% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -3.04% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.61% | -0.08% |
Volatility
HYG vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.21%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 1.42% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 4.30% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 5.56% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 8.16% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 9.15% | -0.86% |
HYG vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than HYHG's 6.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.91% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.78% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and HYHG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYHG has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to HYG (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs HYHG's -25.71%.
On 10-year performance, HYHG leads with 6.12% vs 4.91% for HYG. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 5.91% for HYG.
HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.50% for HYHG.
HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer