HYG vs. DADS
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYG is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
HYG vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 15.40% return.
HYG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
DADS
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYG vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.32% | 2.96% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 15.40% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and DADS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
DADS
HYG vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYG | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYG | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.81 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
HYG vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -17.07% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -1.90% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -7.66% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | — | — |
Volatility
HYG vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 17.59% | -13.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 17.59% | -10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 17.59% | -9.30% |
HYG vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than DADS's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.74% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.92% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and DADS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 2.74% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for HYG and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer