HYG vs. BSJQ
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and BSJQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYG tracks the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index while BSJQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYG returned 3.77%/yr vs 3.74%/yr for BSJQ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJQ.
Performance
HYG vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than BSJQ's 0.85% return.
HYG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
BSJQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- —
HYG vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.32% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -3.55% |
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 0.85% | 6.59% | 7.49% | 9.83% | -7.35% | 4.53% | 2.80% | 16.74% | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and BSJQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between HYG and BSJQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYG vs. BSJQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYG
BSJQ
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
HYG
BSJQ
-
Real Estate
HYG
BSJQ
Basic Materials
HYG
-
BSJQ
-
Communication Services
HYG
-
BSJQ
Consumer Cyclical
HYG
-
BSJQ
Consumer Defensive
HYG
-
BSJQ
-
Energy
HYG
-
BSJQ
Financial Services
HYG
-
BSJQ
Healthcare
HYG
-
BSJQ
-
Industrials
HYG
-
BSJQ
Technology
HYG
-
BSJQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
BSJQ
HYG vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYG | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 3.35 | -1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 5.25 | -2.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.76 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 8.57 | -5.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 41.55 | -29.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYG | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 3.35 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.66 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.54 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
HYG vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than BSJQ's maximum drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and BSJQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -24.13% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -0.54% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -2.66% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -11.95% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.43% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -2.17% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.11% | +0.42% |
Volatility
HYG vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 0.54%. This indicates that HYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 0.54% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 0.98% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 1.38% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 5.73% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 8.45% | -0.16% |
HYG vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than BSJQ's 5.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 5.83% | 6.10% | 6.58% | 6.58% | 5.58% | 4.27% | 4.64% | 4.59% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.92% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and BSJQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYG has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs BSJQ's -24.13%.
On 5-year performance, HYG leads with 3.77% vs 3.74% for BSJQ. On fees, BSJQ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYG has performed better with a 3.77% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSJQ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 5.83% for BSJQ.
HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.42% for BSJQ.
BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and BSJQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer