HYG vs. BINC
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. HYG is passively managed, while BINC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYG returned 8.47%/yr vs 7.04%/yr for BINC. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.
Performance
HYG vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.29% return.
HYG
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
BINC
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYG vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.78% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 8.04% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.29% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and BINC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between HYG and BINC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
BINC
HYG vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYG | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.52 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.20 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.11 | 8.60 | +4.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYG vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -2.69% | -31.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -2.69% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -2.69% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -0.36% | -2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.69% | -0.16% |
Volatility
HYG vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.75%. This indicates that HYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 0.75% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 1.87% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 2.30% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 2.99% | +4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 2.99% | +5.30% |
HYG vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, which matches BINC's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.84% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.89% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and BINC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYG has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs BINC's -2.69%.
On 3-year performance, HYG leads with 8.47% vs 7.04% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYG has performed better with a 8.47% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 5.84% for BINC.
HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.40% for BINC.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer