PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYFI vs. IBHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYFI vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYFI achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than IBHG's 1.10% return.


HYFI

1D
0.03%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.35%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
10Y*

IBHG

1D
0.14%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.57%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYFI vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
1.98%8.91%7.98%8.66%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.10%6.90%7.42%7.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HYFI and IBHG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2023

0.78

The correlation between HYFI and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYFI vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYFI
HYFI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HYFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHG
IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYFI vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYFIIBHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

6.51

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

23.87

-9.97

HYFI vs. IBHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the IBHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYFI and IBHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYFIIBHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.24

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.57

+1.13

Drawdowns

HYFI vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYFI drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, smaller than the maximum IBHG drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFI and IBHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYFIIBHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-13.85%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-0.73%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.34%

-3.39%

-2.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.09%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-2.67%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.20%

+0.35%

Volatility

HYFI vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison

AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.59%. This indicates that HYFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYFIIBHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

0.59%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

1.53%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

2.11%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

6.36%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

6.36%

-1.00%

HYFI vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYFI vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison

HYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than IBHG's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
6.64%6.66%6.57%4.17%0.00%0.00%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.07%6.33%7.02%6.66%5.62%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYFI and IBHG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYFI has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to IBHG (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYFI dropped -6.34% vs IBHG's -13.85%.

On 3-year performance, HYFI leads with 9.21% vs 7.53% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYFI has performed better with a 9.21% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYFI.

HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 6.07% for IBHG.

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYFI and 0.35% for IBHG.

IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYFI and IBHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer