PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYFA.L is traded in USD, while HYEA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the HYEA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HYFA.L having a 0.62% return and HYEA.L slightly lower at 0.59%.


HYFA.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.45%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*

HYEA.L

1D
0.16%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.68%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYFA.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
0.62%9.60%5.20%10.21%-13.83%5.51%8.98%12.43%-5.11%0.23%
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.59%15.17%2.47%12.66%-12.07%0.88%6.94%11.93%-3.98%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HYFA.L and HYEA.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017

0.59

The correlation between HYFA.L and HYEA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYFA.L
HYFA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HYFA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEA.L
HYEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYFA.LHYEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.26

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

4.18

+1.85

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYFA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYFA.L and HYEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYFA.LHYEA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.07

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.37

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.43

+0.09

Drawdowns

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYFA.L drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than HYEA.L's maximum drawdown of -23.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFA.L and HYEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYFA.LHYEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-23.34%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.33%

-4.79%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

-5.05%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

-22.62%

+4.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-1.36%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-4.18%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.45%

-0.20%

Volatility

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) at 1.49%. This indicates that HYFA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYFA.LHYEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

1.49%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

3.98%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

5.69%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

8.12%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.52%

8.70%

-0.18%

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYFA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HYEA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYFA.L vs. HYEA.L - Dividend Comparison

HYFA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, while HYEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYFA.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
6.57%6.57%7.05%6.73%5.78%4.63%5.86%6.08%6.19%5.46%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYFA.L and HYEA.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYFA.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYFA.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYEA.L.

HYFA.L tracks FTSE Time-Weighted US Fallen Angel Bond Select Index, while HYEA.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HYFA.L and 0.50% for HYEA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYFA.L and HYEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer