PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEM vs. HYHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEM vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HYEM having a 4.38% return and HYHG slightly higher at 4.39%. Over the past 10 years, HYEM has underperformed HYHG with an annualized return of 4.33%, while HYHG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.97% annualized return.


HYEM

1D
0.15%
1M
0.25%
6M
2.70%
YTD
4.38%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
4.33%
ALL TIME*
4.72%

HYHG

1D
0.31%
1M
0.56%
6M
3.29%
YTD
4.39%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
5.97%
ALL TIME*
4.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.89M$2.23M$4.32M
$2.24M$1.63M$1.20M

HYEM vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYEM
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
4.38%9.24%12.14%8.35%-13.39%-1.31%6.87%12.85%-3.38%7.94%
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
4.39%5.31%11.41%14.69%-1.71%5.75%0.16%12.02%-1.95%3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEM and HYHG is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.31

The correlation between HYEM and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEM vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HYHG
HYHG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HYHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYHG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HYHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYEM vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYEMHYHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.99

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

13.34

-2.22

HYEM vs. HYHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the HYHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEM and HYHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYEM vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than HYHG's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and HYHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEMHYHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-25.71%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-2.02%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-7.47%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.29%

-9.21%

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

-25.71%

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-3.01%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.60%

+0.08%

Volatility

HYEM vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) is 0.72%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that HYEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEMHYHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

1.33%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

3.96%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

5.59%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

8.17%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.26%

9.07%

+0.19%

HYEM vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYEM vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison

HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than HYHG's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYEM
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.79%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
6.67%6.97%6.57%6.07%5.58%4.54%5.21%6.06%6.45%5.57%5.37%6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEM and HYHG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYHG has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to HYEM (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYEM dropped -30.96% vs HYHG's -25.71%.

On 10-year performance, HYHG leads with 5.97% vs 4.33% for HYEM. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYEM has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.

HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 6.67% for HYHG.

HYEM tracks ICE BofA Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while HYHG tracks FTSE High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM and 0.50% for HYHG.

HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEM and HYHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer