HYEM vs. FEDCX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX).
HYEM is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. It was launched on May 8, 2012. FEDCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 17, 2011.
Performance
HYEM vs. FEDCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HYEM vs. FEDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 0.36% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -13.39% | -1.31% | 6.87% | 12.85% | -3.38% | 7.94% |
FEDCX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund | -1.01% | 14.91% | 7.39% | 11.92% | -16.08% | -1.28% | 4.78% | 10.50% | -4.55% | 10.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than FEDCX's -1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, HYEM has outperformed FEDCX with an annualized return of 4.66%, while FEDCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.29% annualized return.
HYEM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 7.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
FEDCX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYEM vs. FEDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FEDCX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HYEM vs. FEDCX — Risk / Return Rank
HYEM
FEDCX
HYEM vs. FEDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYEM | FEDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 2.13 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 3.01 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.45 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.35 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 10.10 | -2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYEM | FEDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.13 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.54 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.65 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.71 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between HYEM and FEDCX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HYEM vs. FEDCX - Dividend Comparison
HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than FEDCX's 5.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.77% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
FEDCX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 5.51% | 5.97% | 5.18% | 5.55% | 3.84% | 3.81% | 4.99% | 5.89% | 6.08% | 7.33% | 7.03% | 5.61% |
Drawdowns
HYEM vs. FEDCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than FEDCX's maximum drawdown of -26.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and FEDCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYEM | FEDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -26.00% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | -4.76% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | -26.00% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | -26.00% | -4.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -3.73% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -4.40% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 1.14% | -0.16% |
Volatility
HYEM vs. FEDCX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) at 1.92%. This indicates that HYEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HYEM | FEDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 1.92% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.41% | 3.07% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 5.22% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 6.27% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.27% | 6.59% | +2.68% |