PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEM.L vs. REGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYEM.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYEM.L is traded in USD, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYEM.L achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than REGB.L's 6.60% return.


HYEM.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.68%
6M
2.60%
YTD
3.15%
1Y
7.88%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*

REGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-19.13%
6M
-13.13%
YTD
6.60%
1Y
68.06%
3Y*
-2.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HYEM.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
3.15%8.98%11.89%7.56%-12.87%-2.27%
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
6.60%88.93%-35.64%-18.71%-31.13%-21.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEM.L and REGB.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.26

The correlation between HYEM.L and REGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYEM.L
HYEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HYEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

REGB.L
REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYEM.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYEM.LREGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.30

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

6.36

+3.17

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the REGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEM.L and REGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, smaller than the maximum REGB.L drawdown of -75.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM.L and REGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEM.LREGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.28%

-75.84%

+48.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-29.76%

+26.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.27%

-60.66%

+56.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-42.74%

+41.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-48.30%

+43.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

10.73%

-9.95%

Volatility

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYEM.L) is 1.28%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that HYEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEM.LREGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

11.11%

-9.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

34.18%

-30.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

46.90%

-41.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.98%

48.26%

-41.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.24%

48.26%

-41.02%

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYEM.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than REGB.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYEM.L vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYEM.L nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYEM.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEM.L and REGB.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYEM.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYEM.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REGB.L.

HYEM.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while REGB.L is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. HYEM.L tracks VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF, while REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM.L and 0.59% for REGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEM.L and REGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer