PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYEA.L is traded in EUR, while UHYG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the UHYG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYEA.L achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than UHYG.L's 2.37% return.


HYEA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

UHYG.L

1D
0.07%
1M
1.37%
YTD
2.37%
6M
-3.74%
1Y
-0.56%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.74%1.53%9.22%9.21%-6.45%8.26%-1.76%14.15%0.72%-1.89%
UHYG.L
Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.37%-9.27%15.03%7.88%-6.75%11.29%-3.40%16.56%2.18%-2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEA.L and UHYG.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017

0.75

The correlation between HYEA.L and UHYG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYEA.L
HYEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

UHYG.L
UHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYEA.LUHYG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.98

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

-0.12

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

-0.23

+8.27

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the UHYG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEA.L and UHYG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYEA.LUHYG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

-0.11

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.38

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.35

+0.20

Drawdowns

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, roughly equal to the maximum UHYG.L drawdown of -21.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEA.L and UHYG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEA.LUHYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.34%

-21.75%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.89%

-7.67%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.63%

-12.67%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.74%

-12.67%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.35%

+9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-5.09%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

4.07%

-3.54%

Volatility

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) is 0.89%, while Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that HYEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEA.LUHYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

1.03%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

7.01%

-4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

8.10%

-4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

8.82%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

9.47%

-2.54%

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYEA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UHYG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYEA.L vs. UHYG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYEA.L nor UHYG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UHYG.L
Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%3.44%6.00%5.93%6.98%6.98%6.59%5.42%4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEA.L and UHYG.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UHYG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UHYG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYEA.L.

HYEA.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while UHYG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYEA.L and 0.25% for UHYG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEA.L and UHYG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer