PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) (JHYU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYEA.L is traded in EUR, while JHYU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JHYU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYEA.L achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than JHYU.L's 3.40% return.


HYEA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

JHYU.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.55%
YTD
3.40%
6M
3.40%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.74%1.53%9.22%9.21%-0.11%
JHYU.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc)
3.40%-3.58%15.07%7.41%-2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEA.L and JHYU.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.65

The correlation between HYEA.L and JHYU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYEA.L
HYEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

JHYU.L
JHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
JHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) (JHYU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYEA.LJHYU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.88

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

6.27

+1.77

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the JHYU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEA.L and JHYU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYEA.LJHYU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.05

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Drawdowns

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, which is greater than JHYU.L's maximum drawdown of -12.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEA.L and JHYU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEA.LJHYU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.34%

-12.44%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.89%

-3.63%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.63%

-12.44%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.27%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-3.69%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

1.09%

-0.56%

Volatility

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) is 0.89%, while JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) (JHYU.L) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that HYEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHYU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEA.LJHYU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

1.13%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

4.50%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

6.53%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

7.83%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

7.83%

-0.90%

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYEA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JHYU.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYEA.L vs. JHYU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYEA.L nor JHYU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEA.L and JHYU.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JHYU.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JHYU.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYEA.L.

Both ETFs track ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYEA.L and 0.35% for JHYU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEA.L and JHYU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer