PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IGHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYEA.L is traded in EUR, while IGHY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IGHY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYEA.L achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly higher than IGHY.L's -1.24% return.


HYEA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

IGHY.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.82%
YTD
-1.24%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
-1.01%
3Y*
0.35%
5Y*
-1.01%
10Y*
-0.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.74%1.53%9.22%9.21%-6.45%8.26%-1.76%14.15%0.72%-1.89%
IGHY.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-1.24%-4.08%3.38%4.14%-9.92%3.08%-5.82%9.65%-4.09%-1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEA.L and IGHY.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between HYEA.L and IGHY.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYEA.L
HYEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IGHY.L
IGHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IGHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IGHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IGHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYEA.LIGHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.96

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

-0.25

+2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

-0.61

+8.65

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the IGHY.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEA.L and IGHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYEA.LIGHY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

-0.23

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

-0.14

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

-0.23

+0.79

Drawdowns

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, smaller than the maximum IGHY.L drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEA.L and IGHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEA.LIGHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.34%

-42.40%

+20.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.89%

-5.25%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.63%

-9.68%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.74%

-12.05%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-34.63%

+34.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-31.58%

+28.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

2.19%

-1.66%

Volatility

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IGHY.L) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEA.LIGHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.87%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

4.49%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

5.79%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

6.97%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

8.41%

-1.48%

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HYEA.L and IGHY.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

HYEA.L vs. IGHY.L - Dividend Comparison

HYEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGHY.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.06%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.04%0.04%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEA.L and IGHY.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYEA.L and IGHY.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Both ETFs track ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEA.L and IGHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer