PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBI vs. XQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBI vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYBI

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.02%
6M
1.29%
YTD
2.12%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.62%

XQQI

1D
2.19%
1M
-2.75%
6M
7.05%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.44M$1.37M$1.62M
$10.60M$13.71M$14.32M

HYBI vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYBI and XQQI is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBI vs. XQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYBI
HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XQQI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYBI vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYBIXQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

HYBI vs. XQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYBI vs. XQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum XQQI drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and XQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBIXQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-15.48%

+10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-8.22%

+8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-3.84%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

Volatility

HYBI vs. XQQI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBIXQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

28.37%

-24.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

28.37%

-23.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

28.37%

-23.53%

HYBI vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBI vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison

HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, less than XQQI's 10.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
8.30%8.48%2.21%
XQQI
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
10.49%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBI and XQQI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYBI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYBI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.49%, compared with 8.30% for HYBI.

HYBI is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while XQQI is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 0.98% for XQQI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBI and XQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer