HYBI vs. UCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HYBI (NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF) and UCON (First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYBI returned 7.35% vs 5.50% for UCON. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYBI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for UCON.

Performance

HYBI vs. UCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than UCON's 0.58% return.

HYBI

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 7.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCON

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: 5.50%
• 3Y*: 5.68%
• 5Y*: 2.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBI vs. UCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF	1.56%	6.97%	-0.48%
UCON First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF	0.58%	7.00%	-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBI and UCON is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.51

The correlation between HYBI and UCON has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYBI vs. UCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYBI	UCON
Technology	35.6%	-
Financial Services	11.8%	-
Communication Services	11.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	-
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Industrials	8.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.6%	-
Utilities	2.3%	100.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

HYBI vs. UCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBI

HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 78
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

UCON

UCON Risk / Return Rank: 52
UCON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
UCON Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
UCON Omega Ratio Rank: 56
UCON Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
UCON Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBI vs. UCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYBI	UCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.85	+0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	2.65	+0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.35	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	2.25	+2.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.91	8.74	+8.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYBI vs. UCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the UCON Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBI and UCON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYBI	UCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	1.85	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.63	+0.34

Drawdowns

HYBI vs. UCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum UCON drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and UCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYBI	UCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-15.31%	+10.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.43%	-2.45%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.61%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-1.48%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.63%	-0.19%

Volatility

HYBI vs. UCON - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 0.98%, while First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYBI	UCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	1.14%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.13%	2.33%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23%	2.98%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.94%	3.89%	+1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.94%	5.89%	-0.95%

HYBI vs. UCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than UCON's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYBI vs. UCON - Dividend Comparison

HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than UCON's 4.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF	8.37%	8.48%	2.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UCON First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF	4.67%	4.63%	4.95%	4.75%	3.12%	2.20%	3.14%	3.25%	1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYBI and UCON in my portfolio?

HYBI and UCON have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYBI or UCON?

UCON has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to HYBI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs UCON's -15.31%.

Which ETF is better, HYBI or UCON?

On 1-year performance, HYBI leads with 7.35% vs 5.50% for UCON. On fees, HYBI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYBI or UCON?

Over the 1-year period, HYBI has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYBI or UCON?

HYBI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for UCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYBI or UCON?

HYBI has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 4.67% for UCON.

What is the main difference between HYBI and UCON?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 0.86% for UCON.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.