PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBI vs. PFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBI vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than PFIX's 11.17% return.


HYBI

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.02%
6M
1.29%
YTD
2.12%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.62%

PFIX

1D
0.46%
1M
18.26%
6M
11.37%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
23.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.44M$1.37M$1.62M
$8.65M$6.17M$16.90M

HYBI vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
2.12%6.97%-0.53%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
11.17%0.42%26.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBI and PFIX is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBI vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYBI
HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIX
PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYBI vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYBIPFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.07

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

0.33

+3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

0.50

+12.49

HYBI vs. PFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the PFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBI and PFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYBI vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and PFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBIPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-36.17%

+31.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-23.71%

+22.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-8.34%

+8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-17.19%

+16.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

15.40%

-14.94%

Volatility

HYBI vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 0.88%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBIPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

7.75%

-6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

21.85%

-19.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

28.94%

-25.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

38.62%

-33.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

38.12%

-33.28%

HYBI vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBI vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison

HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, more than PFIX's 7.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
8.30%8.48%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
7.78%9.92%3.40%87.92%0.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBI and PFIX have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to HYBI (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs PFIX's -36.17%.

On 1-year performance, PFIX leads with 7.75% vs 5.93% for HYBI. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HYBI.

HYBI has the higher dividend yield at 8.30%, compared with 7.78% for PFIX.

HYBI is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while PFIX is Inverse Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 0.50% for PFIX.

HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBI and PFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer