HYBI vs. DUKZ
HYBI (NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF) and DUKZ (Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYBI returned 7.35% vs 8.21% for DUKZ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYBI charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for DUKZ.
Performance
HYBI vs. DUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than DUKZ's 2.53% return.
HYBI
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 7.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUKZ
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYBI vs. DUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | 1.56% | 6.97% | -0.48% |
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF | 2.53% | 4.24% | -1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBI and DUKZ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between HYBI and DUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYBI vs. DUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYBI
DUKZ
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
HYBI
DUKZ
Financial Services
HYBI
DUKZ
-
Communication Services
HYBI
DUKZ
Consumer Cyclical
HYBI
DUKZ
Healthcare
HYBI
DUKZ
Industrials
HYBI
DUKZ
Consumer Defensive
HYBI
DUKZ
-
Energy
HYBI
DUKZ
-
Utilities
HYBI
DUKZ
Real Estate
HYBI
DUKZ
-
Basic Materials
HYBI
DUKZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBI vs. DUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
HYBI
DUKZ
HYBI vs. DUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYBI | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 1.92 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | 2.72 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 2.43 | +2.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.91 | 9.00 | +7.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYBI | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 1.92 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 1.18 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
HYBI vs. DUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, roughly equal to the maximum DUKZ drawdown of -4.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and DUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBI | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -4.70% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.43% | -3.39% | +1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.54% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -1.14% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.91% | -0.47% |
Volatility
HYBI vs. DUKZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 0.98%, while Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) has a volatility of 1.94%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBI | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.94% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.13% | 3.62% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23% | 4.30% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 4.30% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 4.30% | +0.64% |
HYBI vs. DUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than DUKZ's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBI vs. DUKZ - Dividend Comparison
HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than DUKZ's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF | 3.79% | 4.05% | 2.44% |
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | 8.37% | 8.48% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBI and DUKZ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUKZ has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to HYBI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs DUKZ's -4.70%.
On 1-year performance, DUKZ leads with 8.21% vs 7.35% for HYBI. On fees, HYBI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DUKZ has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYBI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKZ.
HYBI has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 3.79% for DUKZ.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 1.03% for DUKZ.
HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYBI and DUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer