HYBB vs. HYG
HYBB (iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - HYBB tracks the ICE BofA BB US High Yield Constrained Index (USD) while HYG tracks the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYBB returned 3.63%/yr vs 3.81%/yr for HYG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HYBB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
HYBB vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBB achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 1.51% return.
HYBB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 6.52%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- —
HYG
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
HYBB vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBB iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | 1.39% | 8.95% | 6.35% | 10.53% | -10.11% | 3.36% | 4.29% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.51% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBB and HYG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between HYBB and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYBB vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYBB
HYG
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HYBB
HYG
-
Basic Materials
HYBB
-
HYG
-
Communication Services
HYBB
-
HYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYBB
-
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
HYBB
-
HYG
-
Energy
HYBB
-
HYG
-
Healthcare
HYBB
-
HYG
-
Industrials
HYBB
-
HYG
-
Real Estate
HYBB
-
HYG
Technology
HYBB
-
HYG
-
Utilities
HYBB
-
HYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBB vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
HYBB
HYG
HYBB vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (HYBB) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYBB | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.79 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 12.34 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYBB | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.72 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.51 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.46 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
HYBB vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBB drawdown since its inception was -15.28%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBB and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBB | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -34.25% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | -2.34% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.01% | -4.56% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | -15.79% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.09% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -3.24% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.53% | +0.02% |
Volatility
HYBB vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (HYBB) is 0.98%, while iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that HYBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBB | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.21% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | 3.01% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28% | 3.81% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 7.53% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 8.29% | -1.62% |
HYBB vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBB vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
HYBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, which matches HYG's 5.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBB iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | 5.86% | 6.08% | 6.22% | 6.28% | 5.04% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.91% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBB and HYG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYG has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to HYBB (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBB dropped -15.28% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 5-year performance, HYG leads with 3.81% vs 3.63% for HYBB. On fees, HYBB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HYBB has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYG has performed better with a 3.81% return vs 3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYBB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 5.86% for HYBB.
HYBB tracks ICE BofA BB US High Yield Constrained Index (USD), while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HYBB and 0.49% for HYG.
HYBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYBB and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer