HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE
HY3M.DE (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - HY3M.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HY3M.DE returned 9.36% vs 33.19% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HY3M.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QUTM.DE.
Performance
HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HY3M.DE achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 13.28% return.
HY3M.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HY3M.DE VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 6.33% | 2.59% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 13.28% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HY3M.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HY3M.DE
QUTM.DE
HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HY3M.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 1.33 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 3.07 | +6.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HY3M.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, smaller than the maximum QUTM.DE drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HY3M.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HY3M.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.08% | -24.77% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.08% | -24.77% | +21.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -18.69% | +17.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -8.07% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 10.79% | -9.74% |
Volatility
HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) is 1.97%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that HY3M.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HY3M.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 7.62% | -5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.14% | 24.70% | -19.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 34.03% | -27.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.61% | 32.86% | -24.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 32.86% | -19.66% |
HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HY3M.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
HY3M.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither HY3M.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HY3M.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HY3M.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HY3M.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
HY3M.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. HY3M.DE tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HY3M.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for HY3M.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer