HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE
HY3M.DE (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) and CEB0.DE (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - HY3M.DE tracks the ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index while CEB0.DE tracks the Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HY3M.DE returned 9.36% vs 1.66% for CEB0.DE. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HY3M.DE achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than CEB0.DE's 2.17% return.
HY3M.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CEB0.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 1.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HY3M.DE VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 6.33% | -3.30% | 12.25% |
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 2.17% | 0.43% | 6.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HY3M.DE and CEB0.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HY3M.DE
CEB0.DE
HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HY3M.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 1.67 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 3.64 | +6.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HY3M.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, which is greater than CEB0.DE's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HY3M.DE and CEB0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HY3M.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.08% | -1.83% | -19.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.08% | -0.99% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -0.37% | -6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 0.46% | +0.59% |
Volatility
HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) at 0.44%. This indicates that HY3M.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEB0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HY3M.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 0.44% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.14% | 1.47% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 1.75% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.61% | 2.01% | +6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 2.01% | +11.19% |
HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HY3M.DE and CEB0.DE have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
HY3M.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Dividend Comparison
HY3M.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEB0.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.71% | 1.84% | 1.43% |
HY3M.DE VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HY3M.DE and CEB0.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HY3M.DE and CEB0.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
HY3M.DE tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while CEB0.DE tracks Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.
Find the right allocation for HY3M.DE and CEB0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer