HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO
HXT.TO (Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF) and ZEO.TO (BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXT.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while ZEO.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Oil & Gas Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXT.TO returned 12.71%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for ZEO.TO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXT.TO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ZEO.TO.
Performance
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than ZEO.TO's 37.72% return. Over the past 10 years, HXT.TO has outperformed ZEO.TO with an annualized return of 12.71%, while ZEO.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.
HXT.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
ZEO.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 37.72%
- 6M
- 32.21%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.08%
- 5Y*
- 25.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 10.03% | 28.74% | 20.94% | 12.02% | -6.27% | 28.11% | 5.36% | 22.18% | -7.89% | 9.77% |
ZEO.TO BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF | 37.72% | 12.35% | 21.51% | 5.98% | 39.67% | 63.65% | -28.56% | 16.50% | -25.62% | -12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXT.TO and ZEO.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HXT.TO and ZEO.TO has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Energy
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
Basic Materials
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Technology
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Industrials
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Utilities
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Communication Services
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Real Estate
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
-
Healthcare
HXT.TO
-
ZEO.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXT.TO
ZEO.TO
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXT.TO | ZEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.52 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 5.34 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.10 | 17.25 | +1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXT.TO | ZEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 3.02 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.39 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.00 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum ZEO.TO drawdown of -77.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and ZEO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXT.TO | ZEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -77.71% | +42.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -9.54% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -17.62% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.33% | -22.59% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.48% | -72.03% | +36.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -2.93% | +2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -21.98% | +17.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 2.95% | -1.30% |
Volatility
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.25%, while BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXT.TO | ZEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 6.99% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 14.57% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.71% | 16.92% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 21.17% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 27.27% | -12.10% |
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEO.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HXT.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEO.TO BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF | 2.59% | 3.42% | 3.86% | 4.82% | 4.69% | 3.27% | 5.54% | 3.55% | 3.57% | 2.46% | 2.50% | 4.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXT.TO and ZEO.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZEO.TO.
HXT.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZEO.TO is Energy Equities. HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while ZEO.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Oil & Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HXT.TO and 0.60% for ZEO.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and ZEO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer