PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than ZCN.TO's 10.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HXT.TO having a 13.12% annualized return and ZCN.TO not far behind at 12.84%.


HXT.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.97%
YTD
11.25%
6M
10.44%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
13.12%

ZCN.TO

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
10.54%
6M
9.63%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
14.61%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF
11.25%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.89%9.77%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
10.54%31.51%21.64%11.63%-5.84%25.05%5.69%22.85%-8.85%8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HXT.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2010

0.96

The correlation between HXT.TO and ZCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO

Financial Services

37.3%
33.7%

Energy

15.9%
18.9%

Basic Materials

12.6%
17.2%

Technology

12.0%
6.7%

Industrials

8.9%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
2.9%

Utilities

2.9%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.5%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Financial Services

HXT.TO
37.3%
ZCN.TO
33.7%

Energy

HXT.TO
15.9%
ZCN.TO
18.9%

Basic Materials

HXT.TO
12.6%
ZCN.TO
17.2%

Technology

HXT.TO
12.0%
ZCN.TO
6.7%

Industrials

HXT.TO
8.9%
ZCN.TO
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HXT.TO
3.9%
ZCN.TO
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

HXT.TO
3.6%
ZCN.TO
2.9%

Utilities

HXT.TO
2.9%
ZCN.TO
3.3%

Communication Services

HXT.TO
2.4%
ZCN.TO
1.8%

Real Estate

HXT.TO
0.5%
ZCN.TO
1.5%

Healthcare

HXT.TO

-

ZCN.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCN.TO
ZCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HXT.TOZCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

3.55

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.96

16.26

+2.70

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXT.TO and ZCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, which is greater than ZCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and ZCN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXT.TOZCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.13%

-37.18%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-9.30%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-12.25%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.33%

-16.25%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.48%

-37.18%

+1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-1.89%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-4.72%

-14.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.03%

-0.35%

Volatility

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.47%, while BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXT.TOZCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

4.23%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

10.71%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

13.13%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

13.19%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

15.00%

+0.16%

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXT.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.03%2.22%2.78%3.29%3.27%2.74%3.24%3.13%3.16%2.75%2.86%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, HXT.TO and ZCN.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HXT.TO.

HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index (Total Return), while ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HXT.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and ZCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer