HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO
HXT.TO (Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF) and ZCN.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - HXT.TO tracks the S&P/TSX 60 Index (Total Return) while ZCN.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXT.TO returned 13.12%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for ZCN.TO. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HXT.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ZCN.TO.
Performance
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than ZCN.TO's 10.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HXT.TO having a 13.12% annualized return and ZCN.TO not far behind at 12.84%.
HXT.TO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
ZCN.TO
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 32.92%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF | 11.25% | 28.74% | 20.94% | 12.02% | -6.27% | 28.11% | 5.36% | 22.18% | -7.89% | 9.77% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 10.54% | 31.51% | 21.64% | 11.63% | -5.84% | 25.05% | 5.69% | 22.85% | -8.85% | 8.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXT.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between HXT.TO and ZCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Energy
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Basic Materials
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Technology
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Industrials
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Utilities
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Communication Services
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Real Estate
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
Healthcare
HXT.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXT.TO
ZCN.TO
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HXT.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 3.55 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.96 | 16.26 | +2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, which is greater than ZCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and ZCN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXT.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.13% | -37.18% | -14.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -9.30% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -12.25% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.33% | -16.25% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.48% | -37.18% | +1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -1.89% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.02% | -4.72% | -14.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.03% | -0.35% |
Volatility
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.47%, while BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXT.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 4.23% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 10.71% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 13.13% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 13.19% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 15.00% | +0.16% |
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXT.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXT.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.03% | 2.22% | 2.78% | 3.29% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.24% | 3.13% | 3.16% | 2.75% | 2.86% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, HXT.TO and ZCN.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HXT.TO.
HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index (Total Return), while ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HXT.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and ZCN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer