HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO
HXT.TO (Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF) and HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXT.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXT.TO returned 13.12%/yr vs 22.27%/yr for HXQ.TO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXT.TO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.
Performance
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than HXQ.TO's 19.67% return. Over the past 10 years, HXT.TO has underperformed HXQ.TO with an annualized return of 13.12%, while HXQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.27% annualized return.
HXT.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 22.27%
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 11.19% | 28.74% | 20.94% | 12.02% | -6.27% | 28.11% | 5.36% | 22.18% | -7.89% | 9.77% |
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 19.67% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 26.20% | 45.58% | 32.26% | 6.71% | 23.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXT.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016 | 0.50 |
The correlation between HXT.TO and HXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Energy
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Basic Materials
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Technology
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Industrials
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Utilities
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Communication Services
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Real Estate
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
Healthcare
HXT.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXT.TO
HXQ.TO
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HXT.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.42 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 3.19 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.34 | 10.12 | +9.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, which is greater than HXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and HXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXT.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.13% | -31.60% | -20.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -12.43% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -22.58% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.33% | -31.60% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.48% | -31.60% | -3.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -2.58% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.06% | -5.74% | -13.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 3.91% | -2.24% |
Volatility
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.94%, while Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXT.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 7.27% | -3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 13.32% | -3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 16.70% | -4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 20.92% | -8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 20.92% | -5.75% |
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXT.TO nor HXQ.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HXT.TO and HXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
HXT.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Horizons. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HXT.TO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and HXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer