HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO
HXT.TO (Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF) and HXEM.TO (Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXT.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while HXEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXT.TO returned 14.43%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for HXEM.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXT.TO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXEM.TO.
Performance
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than HXEM.TO's 28.95% return.
HXT.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
HXEM.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 28.95%
- 6M
- 29.50%
- 1Y
- 56.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 10.03% | 28.74% | 20.94% | 12.02% | -6.27% | 28.11% | 5.50% |
HXEM.TO Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 28.95% | 26.46% | 14.53% | 7.09% | -16.39% | -2.71% | 12.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXT.TO and HXEM.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.49 |
The correlation between HXT.TO and HXEM.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Energy
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Basic Materials
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Technology
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Industrials
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Utilities
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Communication Services
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
-
Real Estate
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
Healthcare
HXT.TO
-
HXEM.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXT.TO
HXEM.TO
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXT.TO | HXEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.53 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 4.61 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.10 | 16.65 | +2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXT.TO | HXEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.91 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.58 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.65 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, roughly equal to the maximum HXEM.TO drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and HXEM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXT.TO | HXEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -35.00% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -12.34% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -15.40% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.33% | -30.44% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.87% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -13.75% | +9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 3.41% | -1.76% |
Volatility
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.25%, while Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXT.TO | HXEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 8.38% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 17.05% | -7.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.71% | 19.60% | -7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 17.03% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 16.95% | -1.78% |
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HXEM.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXT.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXT.TO nor HXEM.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HXT.TO and HXEM.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXEM.TO.
HXT.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while HXEM.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while HXEM.TO tracks Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HXT.TO and 0.25% for HXEM.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and HXEM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer