HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO
HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) and ZSP-U.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from Global X and BMO respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXS.TO returned 15.90%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for ZSP-U.TO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HXS.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZSP-U.TO.
Performance
HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HXS.TO is traded in CAD, while ZSP-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ZSP-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with HXS.TO at 11.99% and ZSP-U.TO at 11.99%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HXS.TO having a 15.90% annualized return and ZSP-U.TO not far behind at 15.53%.
HXS.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
ZSP-U.TO
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 28.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 16.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 11.99% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 15.78% | 24.69% | 3.03% | 13.60% |
ZSP-U.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) | 11.99% | 11.48% | 34.63% | 22.72% | -13.06% | 26.97% | 15.66% | 24.09% | 2.24% | 13.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXS.TO and ZSP-U.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2012 | 0.84 |
The correlation between HXS.TO and ZSP-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXS.TO
ZSP-U.TO
HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXS.TO | ZSP-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.24 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 12.46 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXS.TO | ZSP-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.46 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 1.01 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.20 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, roughly equal to the maximum ZSP-U.TO drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and ZSP-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXS.TO | ZSP-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.42% | -27.34% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -8.83% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | -18.89% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.63% | -22.19% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.42% | -27.34% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.20% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -3.51% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.29% | +0.01% |
Volatility
HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) at 2.96%. This indicates that HXS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSP-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXS.TO | ZSP-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 2.96% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 8.99% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 11.64% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 14.95% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 16.04% | +0.49% |
HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXS.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP-U.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXS.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXS.TO nor ZSP-U.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSP-U.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.02% | 1.07% | 1.26% | 1.22% | 1.43% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, HXS.TO and ZSP-U.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZSP-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSP-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HXS.TO.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HXS.TO and 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXS.TO and ZSP-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer