HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO
HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) and HXE.TO (Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while HXE.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index (Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXS.TO returned 16.01%/yr vs 12.02%/yr for HXE.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXS.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for HXE.TO.
Performance
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXS.TO achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than HXE.TO's 45.06% return. Over the past 10 years, HXS.TO has outperformed HXE.TO with an annualized return of 16.01%, while HXE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.02% annualized return.
HXS.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
HXE.TO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 45.06%
- 6M
- 39.83%
- 1Y
- 74.64%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 30.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.02%
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 12.45% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 15.78% | 24.69% | 3.03% | 13.60% |
HXE.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF | 45.06% | 17.30% | 14.39% | 3.95% | 53.52% | 81.48% | -33.82% | 10.05% | -26.98% | -12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXS.TO and HXE.TO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013 | 0.15 |
The correlation between HXS.TO and HXE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Financial Services
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Communication Services
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Healthcare
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Industrials
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Energy
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
Utilities
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Real Estate
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Basic Materials
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXS.TO
HXE.TO
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXS.TO | HXE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.52 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 6.90 | -3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 19.73 | -6.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXS.TO | HXE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 3.24 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 1.03 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.36 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.22 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, smaller than the maximum HXE.TO drawdown of -85.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and HXE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXS.TO | HXE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.42% | -85.92% | +58.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -10.88% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | -25.34% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.63% | -28.83% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.42% | -80.40% | +52.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.37% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -30.80% | +27.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 3.80% | -1.50% |
Volatility
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) is 3.21%, while Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that HXS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXS.TO | HXE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 9.60% | -6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.84% | 18.90% | -10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 23.26% | -11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 29.23% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 33.74% | -17.22% |
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXS.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HXE.TO's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXS.TO nor HXE.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HXS.TO and HXE.TO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for HXE.TO.
HXS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while HXE.TO is Energy Equities. HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while HXE.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index (Total Return). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HXS.TO and 0.27% for HXE.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXS.TO and HXE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer