PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXS.TO achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than HXE.TO's 45.06% return. Over the past 10 years, HXS.TO has outperformed HXE.TO with an annualized return of 16.01%, while HXE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.02% annualized return.


HXS.TO

1D
0.41%
1M
6.66%
YTD
12.45%
6M
10.57%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
16.74%
10Y*
16.01%

HXE.TO

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
45.06%
6M
39.83%
1Y
74.64%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
30.04%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
12.45%11.93%34.98%23.22%-12.72%27.30%15.78%24.69%3.03%13.60%
HXE.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF
45.06%17.30%14.39%3.95%53.52%81.48%-33.82%10.05%-26.98%-12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HXS.TO and HXE.TO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013

0.15

The correlation between HXS.TO and HXE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXS.TO
HXE.TO

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
100.0%

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

HXS.TO
35.6%
HXE.TO

-

Financial Services

HXS.TO
11.8%
HXE.TO

-

Communication Services

HXS.TO
11.2%
HXE.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HXS.TO
10.1%
HXE.TO

-

Healthcare

HXS.TO
8.5%
HXE.TO

-

Industrials

HXS.TO
8.3%
HXE.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HXS.TO
4.9%
HXE.TO

-

Energy

HXS.TO
3.5%
HXE.TO
100.0%

Utilities

HXS.TO
2.4%
HXE.TO

-

Real Estate

HXS.TO
1.9%
HXE.TO

-

Basic Materials

HXS.TO
1.8%
HXE.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

HXE.TO
HXE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXS.TOHXE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.52

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

6.90

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

19.73

-6.76

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXS.TO and HXE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXS.TOHXE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

3.24

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

1.03

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.36

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.22

+0.80

Drawdowns

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, smaller than the maximum HXE.TO drawdown of -85.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and HXE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXS.TOHXE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.42%

-85.92%

+58.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-10.88%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-25.34%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

-28.83%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

-80.40%

+52.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.37%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-30.80%

+27.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.80%

-1.50%

Volatility

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) is 3.21%, while Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that HXS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXS.TOHXE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

9.60%

-6.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.84%

18.90%

-10.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

23.26%

-11.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

29.23%

-14.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

33.74%

-17.22%

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXS.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HXE.TO's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXS.TO nor HXE.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HXS.TO and HXE.TO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for HXE.TO.

HXS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while HXE.TO is Energy Equities. HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while HXE.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index (Total Return). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HXS.TO and 0.27% for HXE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXS.TO and HXE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer