HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO
HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) and HXCN.TO (Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while HXCN.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXS.TO returned 16.64%/yr vs 14.86%/yr for HXCN.TO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXS.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for HXCN.TO.
Performance
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXS.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than HXCN.TO's 10.69% return.
HXS.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
HXCN.TO
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 34.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- —
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 11.99% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 8.91% |
HXCN.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF | 10.69% | 31.20% | 21.60% | 11.98% | -6.07% | 25.23% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXS.TO and HXCN.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between HXS.TO and HXCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Financial Services
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Communication Services
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Healthcare
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Industrials
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Energy
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Utilities
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Real Estate
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Basic Materials
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXS.TO | HXCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.49 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.92 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 17.26 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXS.TO | HXCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.74 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 1.09 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.82 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, smaller than the maximum HXCN.TO drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and HXCN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXS.TO | HXCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.42% | -37.09% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -8.81% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | -12.49% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.63% | -16.27% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.96% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -4.11% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.00% | +0.30% |
Volatility
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) is 3.27%, while Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that HXS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXS.TO | HXCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 3.48% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 10.04% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 12.60% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 13.72% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 17.81% | -1.28% |
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXS.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than HXCN.TO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXS.TO nor HXCN.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HXS.TO and HXCN.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXCN.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HXS.TO.
HXS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while HXCN.TO is Canada Equities. HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while HXCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HXS.TO and 0.05% for HXCN.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXS.TO and HXCN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer