PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXS.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than HXCN.TO's 10.69% return.


HXS.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
7.20%
YTD
11.99%
6M
10.17%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
23.29%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
15.90%

HXCN.TO

1D
-0.96%
1M
3.65%
YTD
10.69%
6M
12.85%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
11.99%11.93%34.98%23.22%-12.72%27.30%8.91%
HXCN.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF
10.69%31.20%21.60%11.98%-6.07%25.23%1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HXS.TO and HXCN.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020

0.59

The correlation between HXS.TO and HXCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXS.TO
HXCN.TO

Technology

35.6%
11.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
32.1%

Communication Services

11.2%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
3.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
0.1%

Industrials

8.3%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.2%

Energy

3.5%
15.7%

Utilities

2.4%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
15.6%

Technology

HXS.TO
35.6%
HXCN.TO
11.2%

Financial Services

HXS.TO
11.8%
HXCN.TO
32.1%

Communication Services

HXS.TO
11.2%
HXCN.TO
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HXS.TO
10.1%
HXCN.TO
3.8%

Healthcare

HXS.TO
8.5%
HXCN.TO
0.1%

Industrials

HXS.TO
8.3%
HXCN.TO
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

HXS.TO
4.9%
HXCN.TO
3.2%

Energy

HXS.TO
3.5%
HXCN.TO
15.7%

Utilities

HXS.TO
2.4%
HXCN.TO
3.4%

Real Estate

HXS.TO
1.9%
HXCN.TO
1.8%

Basic Materials

HXS.TO
1.8%
HXCN.TO
15.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

HXCN.TO
HXCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HXCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXS.TOHXCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.49

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.92

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.62

17.26

-4.64

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the HXCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXS.TO and HXCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXS.TOHXCN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.74

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

1.09

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.82

+0.20

Drawdowns

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, smaller than the maximum HXCN.TO drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and HXCN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXS.TOHXCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.42%

-37.09%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-8.81%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-12.49%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

-16.27%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.96%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-4.11%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.00%

+0.30%

Volatility

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) is 3.27%, while Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that HXS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXS.TOHXCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.48%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

10.04%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

12.60%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

13.72%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

17.81%

-1.28%

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXS.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than HXCN.TO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXS.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXS.TO nor HXCN.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HXS.TO and HXCN.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXCN.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HXS.TO.

HXS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while HXCN.TO is Canada Equities. HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while HXCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HXS.TO and 0.05% for HXCN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXS.TO and HXCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer