HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO
HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) and HULC.TO (Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while HULC.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXS.TO returned 16.64%/yr vs 34.17%/yr for HULC.TO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXS.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HULC.TO.
Performance
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HXS.TO having a 11.99% return and HULC.TO slightly higher at 12.50%.
HXS.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
HULC.TO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 29.64%
- 3Y*
- 24.34%
- 5Y*
- 34.17%
- 10Y*
- —
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 11.99% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 21.97% |
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF | 12.50% | 12.69% | 35.93% | 24.43% | -14.75% | 153.78% | 26.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXS.TO and HULC.TO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between HXS.TO and HULC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Financial Services
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Communication Services
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Healthcare
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Industrials
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Energy
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Utilities
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Real Estate
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Basic Materials
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXS.TO
HULC.TO
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXS.TO | HULC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.41 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 12.23 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXS.TO | HULC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.38 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.73 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.75 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, which is greater than HULC.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and HULC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXS.TO | HULC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.42% | -23.94% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -8.73% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | -19.46% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.63% | -23.94% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.15% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -4.68% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.43% | -0.13% |
Volatility
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) at 3.01%. This indicates that HXS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HULC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXS.TO | HULC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 3.01% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 9.25% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 12.53% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 46.99% | -31.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 43.82% | -27.29% |
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXS.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than HULC.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXS.TO vs. HULC.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXS.TO nor HULC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, HXS.TO and HULC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HULC.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HULC.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HXS.TO.
HXS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while HULC.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while HULC.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HXS.TO and 0.08% for HULC.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXS.TO and HULC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer