HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) and ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Horizons and BMO respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO returned 22.59%/yr vs 20.08%/yr for ZQQ.TO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HXQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZQQ.TO.
Performance
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly higher than ZQQ.TO's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO has outperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 22.59%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.08% annualized return.
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 22.84%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 43.40%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.13%
- 10Y*
- 22.59%
ZQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 38.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 22.84% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 26.20% | 45.58% | 32.26% | 6.71% | 23.12% |
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 19.82% | 18.38% | 24.00% | 52.52% | -33.75% | 26.68% | 45.33% | 37.08% | -2.29% | 31.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Communication Services
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Healthcare
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Industrials
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Utilities
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Basic Materials
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Energy
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Financial Services
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Real Estate
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXQ.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.43 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 3.01 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | 11.25 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXQ.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.46 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.72 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | 0.90 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.91 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXQ.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -36.39% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -12.86% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -22.79% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.60% | -36.39% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -36.39% | +4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.28% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -5.37% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 3.43% | +0.43% |
Volatility
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXQ.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.54% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 12.02% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 15.73% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 22.57% | -1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 22.41% | -1.58% |
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.14% | 0.41% | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.57% | 1.60% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.
Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer