PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly higher than ZQQ.TO's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO has outperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 22.59%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.08% annualized return.


HXQ.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
13.01%
YTD
22.84%
6M
19.20%
1Y
43.40%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
21.13%
10Y*
22.59%

ZQQ.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
10.63%
YTD
19.82%
6M
18.08%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
20.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
22.84%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%26.20%45.58%32.26%6.71%23.12%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
19.82%18.38%24.00%52.52%-33.75%26.68%45.33%37.08%-2.29%31.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016

0.87

The correlation between HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO

Technology

55.9%
54.1%

Communication Services

15.8%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
12.2%

Healthcare

4.4%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.6%

Industrials

3.1%
3.1%

Utilities

1.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.2%

Energy

0.5%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.3%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.1%

Technology

HXQ.TO
55.9%
ZQQ.TO
54.1%

Communication Services

HXQ.TO
15.8%
ZQQ.TO
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HXQ.TO
13.2%
ZQQ.TO
12.2%

Healthcare

HXQ.TO
4.4%
ZQQ.TO
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

HXQ.TO
4.4%
ZQQ.TO
7.6%

Industrials

HXQ.TO
3.1%
ZQQ.TO
3.1%

Utilities

HXQ.TO
1.4%
ZQQ.TO
1.4%

Basic Materials

HXQ.TO
1.0%
ZQQ.TO
1.2%

Energy

HXQ.TO
0.5%
ZQQ.TO
0.6%

Financial Services

HXQ.TO
0.3%
ZQQ.TO
0.2%

Real Estate

HXQ.TO
0.2%
ZQQ.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXQ.TOZQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.01

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.28

11.25

+0.04

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXQ.TOZQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.46

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.72

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

0.90

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.91

+0.17

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXQ.TOZQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-36.39%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-12.86%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-22.79%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

-36.39%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-36.39%

+4.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-5.37%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

3.43%

+0.43%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXQ.TOZQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

4.54%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

12.02%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

15.73%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

22.57%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

22.41%

-1.58%

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
0.22%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and ZQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer